Make An Enquiry - Call Us - 01892 249 066

Agreement of Indemnity Punjab National Bank

6 mins | Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /customers/c/5/0/ on line 28 Notice: Trying to get property 'cat_name' of non-object in /customers/c/5/0/ on line 28 Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /customers/c/5/0/ on line 29 Notice: Trying to get property 'cat_ID' of non-object in /customers/c/5/0/ on line 29 | Jan 24, 2022

At the same time, if he has fulfilled all the conditions of the contract, he is entitled to the benefits. This was held in the United Commercial Bank vs Bank of India AIR case in 1981. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that courts should not issue injunctions restricting the performance of contractual obligations under a letter of credit or bank guarantee if the conditions are met. He noted that these Letters of Commerce or bank guarantees impose an absolute payment obligation on the banker. According to that article, the rights of the holder of the indemnity are neither absolute nor unlimited. He must act within the limits of the powers granted to him by the promisor and must not violate the orders of the provocateur. In addition, he must act with normal intelligence, prudence and care with which he would act if there were no compensation contract. According to a compensation agreement, the promisor`s liability arises from damage caused to the promettant by the proprotant`s own conduct or by the conduct of another person. § 125: The holder of compensation has the right to recover the following amounts from the person liable for compensation, provided that he acts within the limits of his powers. In English law, a compensation agreement is defined as “a promise to protect another harmless from losses caused by a transaction made at the instigation of the proprometant”. This definition includes a promise to compensate for the loss that results from any reason. Thus, Indian courts follow English law with regard to the indemnification contract, which also covers insurance contracts.

It has been established that – this is a general principle of law where an act is performed by a person at the request of another person whose act is not in itself manifestly criminal to the knowledge of the person performing it, and such an act infringes the rights of a third party, the person who performs it is entitled to compensation from the person who performs it, who asked for it. Example: X asks Y to beat Z and promises to compensate Y for the consequences. Y beat Z and was fined Rs 1,000. Y cannot demand this amount of X because the object of the contract was illegal. Article 124: The term “compensation” means compensating for the loss or compensating the party who has suffered damage. This is a contract whereby one party promises to protect the other against losses incurred by it as a result of the proprotant`s own conduct or by the conduct of another person is called a “set-off agreement”. Any insurance contract, with the exception of life insurance, is a compensation contract. The definition is limited to cases where the loss was caused by a human capacity to act. Secretary of State vs. Bank of India: A broker in possession of a government promissory note confirmed this to a bank with a counterfeit note. The bank, acting in good faith, requested and received a renewed promissory note from the Public Debt Office.

In the meantime, the true owner sued the Secretary of State for conversion, who in turn sued the bank for implied compensation. A compensation contract is a direct cooperation between two parties, whereby one promises to save the other damage. It does not deal with categories of cases where compensation results from damage caused by events or accidents that do not or cannot depend on the conduct of the person responsible for compensation or any other person. A compensation contract may be express or implied depending on the circumstances of the case, although section 124 of the Indian Contracts Act does not appear to cover the case of implied compensation. The Indian Contract Act of 1872 is silent at the time of the opening of the liability of the person liable for compensation. On the basis of the judicial decision of the courts, it can be said that the liability of a person liable for compensation begins as soon as the liability of the holder of compensation becomes absolute and certain. In other words, if the holder of the compensation has assumed absolute responsibility, even if he has not paid anything himself, he is entitled to ask the compensation provider to compensate him. The person who promises to compensate for the loss is called the “compensation giver”: in the example above, A is the person responsible for the compensation. The person whose loss is to be compensated is referred to as the “compensation holder”. In the example above, B is the holder of the remuneration.

Does the compensation contract cover diarrhea caused by events or accidents that do not depend on the behavior of the promisor or another person? If the definition of a compensation contract under section 124 is interpreted restrictively, it would not cover claims caused by events or accidents that do not depend on the conduct of the promisor or any other person. In other words, insurance contracts are outside the scope of the indemnity contract. As legislators never intended to exclude insurance contracts from the scope of compensation contracts, the Indian courts decided to apply the same principles of equity law as the English courts. Simpson v. Thomson: If a person has agreed to compensate the other, after compensation has been made, he or she is entitled to all means by which the indemnified person could have protected himself or herself against the loss or compensated himself for it. Example A Contracts to exempt B from the consequences of a proceeding that C may initiate against B for a certain amount of Rs 200. This is a compensation agreement. The principle of subrogation is applicable because it is an essential part of the right to compensation and is based on equity and the Contracts Act does not contain any provisions that contradict [Maharaja Shri Jarvat Singhji v. Secretary of State for India] The indemnification contract and the guarantee contract are special types of contracts. The specific provisions relating to these contracts are set out in sections 124 to 147 of the Indian Contract Act 1872. In addition to these specific provisions, the general principles of contracts also apply to those specific contracts.

In the case of Mohit Kumar Saha v. New India Assurance Co AIR in 1997, Calcutta HC ruled that the person liable for compensation must pay the full amount of the vehicle lost in the flight, as indicated by the surveyor. Any compensation of lesser value is arbitrary and unjust and violates article 14 of the Constitution. This definition contains the following essential elements – example:- X promises to compensate Y for any loss. that he can suffer by taking legal action against Z. . .

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn More. Got It